To mark World Consumer Rights Day in 2016, experts from Queen Margaret University’s Consumer Dispute Resolution Centre in Edinburgh, have published a new research report (external PDF) highlighting the value of ombudsman schemes in helping consumers realise their rights.
Consumer complaints are big business. UK consumers made 52 million complaints last year, with one in 11 people taking their complaint to an ombudsman and one in 25 to a small claims court. Despite these astonishing figures, consumer problems are often deflected or ignored altogether.
The Centre, which runs the MSc Dispute Resolution, the world’s first master’s degree specifically for ombudsman and complaint handling professionals, has been working for a number of years with ombudsman and complaint handling organisations to help UK consumers get a fairer deal. QMU is aiming to help raise standards across the complaint handling industry by drawing on insights from its research, which has recently examined the outcome of complaints, the use of complaints to drive innovation, and best practice in the design of complaint processes.
The Centre’s latest research report, commissioned by Ombudsman Services, looks at recent developments in the UK and Europe which reveal both opportunities and challenges for those interested in making consumer rights a reality. This includes the EU’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Directive and the UK Consumer Rights Act. While these measures potentially enhance consumer protection, there remains a need to ensure that external redress mechanisms are effective and fit for purpose.
QMU’s research compares various means of resolving consumer problems, with a particular focus on consumer ombudsman schemes. The key conclusion of the research is that ombudsman schemes have distinct advantages when it comes to realising consumer rights, including greater accessibility, provision of more support to the consumer, and learning from complaints.
The research also looks at other forms of dispute resolution, such as ADR schemes and courts, and argues that these are less accessible to consumers and have less of a focus on helping businesses to improve their services. The report argues that whereas other forms of dispute resolution are only about settling complaints, ombudsman schemes have potential to add value for consumers and businesses and represent a potentially powerful approach to realising consumer rights.
Chris Gill, Senior Lecturer in Administrative Justice and Programme Leader for MSc Dispute Resolution at QMU
Chris Gill, Senior Lecturer in Administrative Justice and Programme Leader for MSc Dispute Resolution at QMU, said: “Consumer rights have recently been strengthened, but more could be done to make sure that consumers get a fair deal in day-to-day service delivery and when they have cause to complain. And while complaints have been increasing, this masks the fact that many people still don’t complain when they have a consumer problem.
“To enhance consumer confidence and encourage them to complain when they receive a sub-standard service, there is a need to make sure that – when things go wrong and a business fails to put them right – consumers have access to high quality external dispute resolution.
“The research we are publishing today suggests that ombudsman schemes should be increasingly seen as the premium approach to external dispute resolution. While the contribution of courts and other forms of ADR should not be dismissed, it is likely that ombudsman schemes provide the best available means to helping consumers realise their rights.”
Lewis Shand Smith, Chief Ombudsman at Ombudsman Services
Commenting on the report, Lewis Shand Smith, Chief Ombudsman at Ombudsman Services, said: “This is an important time for consumer dispute resolution in the UK and Europe. The landscape for resolving consumer problems is changing fast, with more and more complaints being dealt with outwith the court system.
“This research helps to clarify the unique role that ombudsman schemes play in the consumer dispute resolution system and shows the added value that they generate for consumers and businesses alike. Ombudsman schemes are a trusted brand for consumers and in an excellent position to help strengthen access to justice.
“As the consumer rights agenda continues to gather pace, this report provides a timely analysis of what good consumer dispute resolution looks like. It confirms that ombudsman schemes will continue to be at the forefront of this agenda, playing a vital role in helping consumers to realise their rights.”
QMU’s report - Defining Consumer Ombudsman Schemes
QMU’s Consumer Dispute Resolution Centre delivers accredited qualifications for professional complaint handlers. The University has a long standing relationship with the Ombudsman Association and the International Ombudsman Institute and regularly delivers courses to dispute resolution for professionals across the UK and beyond.
- Ombudsman Services is an ombudsman service that provides dispute resolution for the communications, energy, property and copyright licensing industries.
- Ombudsman Services was founded in 2002 to provide independent dispute resolution. The organisation provides an independent, impartial and cost effective means of resolving disputes outside the courts.
- Ombudsman Services are experts in dispute resolution; here to sort out complaints about the companies which have joined us.
- Ombudsman Services operate under appropriate legislation and regulatory authority, and their governance ensures that they are independent. Their Chief Executive/Chief Ombudsman is Mr Lewis Shand Smith. They employ 428 case handlers, approximately 85% of whom are employed on a full time basis and 15% of whom are employed on a fixed term contract basis. Case handlers are appointed upon successful completion of an interview and a skills based selection test.
- Ombudsman Services is a not for profit private company.
For further media information please contact Jonathan Perkins, Press and PR Officer, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, T: 0131 474 0000, E: firstname.lastname@example.org
Originally posted in Ombudsman Services on March 15, 2016.