Complaints Summary – Academic Year 2023-2024

1.1  The University’s Complaint Handling Procedure is adopted from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman’s (“SPSO”) Model Complaints Handling Procedure for Higher Education. An update of the procedure was approved by the University Senate in March 2021. 

 

1.2  As part of this update, the SPSO has updated its requirements for the reporting of complaints and the publishing of complaints performance statistics, complaints trends and outcomes, and actions taken to improve services. Parts 2 and 3 of this report will be published on the University’s website in accordance with this requirement. 

 

1.3  The Complaints Handling Procedure sets out a complaints process with two steps: frontline resolution and investigation. Frontline resolution is appropriate where complaints require little or no investigation and can be resolved within five working days (or ten if an extension is appropriate). Any member of staff may deal with complaints at this stage (including a staff member complained about) with the aim to respond to complaints at the earliest opportunity and as close to the point of service delivery as possible. The investigation stage is invoked for more complex cases, and the procedure states that a full response to the complaint should be provided as soon as possible but not later than 20 working days from the time the complaint was received for investigation. Not all investigations will be able to meet this deadline, and where that is the case, the complainant will be advised of this, and of the revised timeframe, and the reason for the extended timeframe.  

 

1.4  The Model Complaints procedure defines as complaints those matters that have proceeded formally through the University’s Complaints Handling Procedure through either the frontline or investigation stages. This means that straightforward matters, such as queries or comments from students or other parties, are interpreted as routine service requests, and are dealt with at a local level rather than proceeding through the formal complaints process.   

 

1.5  This report provides a summary of the number and nature of complaints that were dealt with under the formal Complaints Handling Procedure during the 2023-24 academic session. Information on performance against published timescales is also provided.  Court members receive an update on complaints activity as part of the Quarterly Compliance Report presented to the Court.

 

1.6  During the reporting period, the Legal Adviser and University Secretary provided support and advice to any member of staff dealing with a complaint at any level. 


1.7  Members are asked to NOTE the information in this report. 

2.1 Indicator One - Total Number of Complaints


During the period under review, there were 32 complaints recorded as being received from students and members of the public (22 in 2022-2023). Twenty-four of the 32 complaints were categorised as ‘frontline’, and nine were categorised on receipt as ‘stage 2’ or were escalated to ‘stage 2’. 

 

 

Stage 1 (Frontline)

Stage 1

(Escalated)

Stage 2 (Investigation)

Total

Student –

School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management

10

0

0

10

Student –

Graduate School

1

0

2

3

Student –

School of Health Sciences

9

1

6

16

Members of the Public

3

0

0

3

Total

23

1

8

32

2.2 Indicator Two – Response Timescales
2.2.1 Stage 1 Complaints

Full response within 5 working days (%)

Full response beyond 5 working days (%)

Total Stage 1 Complaints responded to

14 (58%)

10 (42%)

24

One complaint originally logged at Stage 1 was subsequently withdrawn by the complainant.
Of the Stage 1 complaints responded to beyond the target 5 working day timeframe, reasons for delay included: 
• Staff absence during the festive and summer period.
• Time taken to gather information to allow response at Stage 1, rather than referring directly to Stage 2.
2.2.2 Stage 1 Complaints – Escalated
There was one complaint escalated from Stage 1 to Stage 2 of the Complaints Handling Procedure in academic year 2023-24. This complaint was escalated by the complainant due to requiring further explanation than provided at Stage 1. 
2.3 INDICATOR THREE – AVERAGE TIME TO RESPOND 

Complaints handling stage

Average number of working days

Target (working days)

Stage 1

6.3

5

Stage 1 (escalated)

24

20

Stage 2

42

20

2.4 INDICATOR FOUR – COMPLAINT OUTCOMES
2.4.1 Stage 1 – Frontline Resolution
Frontline cases are dealt with by the most appropriate member of the ‘frontline’ team, with the aim of resolving the issue/s raised.  As a formal ‘investigation’ of the issue/s is not carried out, frontline cases are not described as being ‘upheld’ or ‘not upheld’. Instead, the aim is to find a resolution to the matter being complained about.
One of the complaints submitted at Stage 1 was not resolved but an explanation was provided, and the remaining 22 Stage 1 complaints were resolved.
2.4.2 Stage 1 Complaints – Escalated
One complaint was escalated from Stage 1 to Stage 2 of the Complaints Handling Procedure in academic year 2023-24. This complaint was partially upheld. 
2.4.3 Stage 2 Complaints
Eight complaints recorded moved to the investigation stage directly due to the nature of the issues raised. 
• Two complaints were upheld following investigation.
• Four complaints were partially upheld following investigation.
• Two complaints were not upheld following investigation.

The University values complaints as a source of learning, and examples of such learning and areas of enhancement arising from complaints are as follows:
• Recommendations have been made to review process in relation to students who are eligible to graduate before their final year. 
• Feedback on communication styles has been provided to members of staff.
• Staff in Student Accommodation Services have reflected on how to better set resident expectations regarding reporting emergency repairs.
• Access issues to the Student Federal Aid system resolved and business continuity in terms of accessing systems improved. 

The subject matter of the stage one complaints are summarised briefly as follows:

Stage 1 Complaints by Subject

 

Resolved

Not resolved

Total

Admissions

1

-

1

Estates and Facilities

2

-

2

Events

1

-

1

Governance

1

-

1

HEP

3

-

2

Learning, Teaching and Assessment

5

1

6

Staff Conduct

6

-

6

Student Accommodation

2

-

2

Student Administration

1

-

2

Total

23

1

24

 

Upheld

Upheld – in part

Not Upheld

Total

Conduct:

Academic staff

 

-

4

2

6

Student Administration:

Access to Student Federal Aid system

 

1

-

-

1

HEP:

Issues with enrolment

 

1

-

-

1

Total

2

4

2

8